Abortion Advocate: ‘So What If Abortion Ends Life?’

‘ALL LIFE IS NOT EQUAL’

magzat3-e1340143835211

There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as seeing a liberal come out and just say what he or she truly believes. It happened last week – twice. First, Rolling Stones reporter Michael Hastings fessed up that, yes, he and his fellow swooners do in fact “lose their minds” whenever they’re in the presence of The One. (Chris Matthews’s leg seen tingling in approval.)

Not to be outdone, Salon’s unabashedly pro-abortion champion, Mary Elizabeth Williams dropped the silly pretense that “an aborted fetus isn’t a baby” – and said the words most pro-”choice” advocates believe – but don’t have the guts to say out loud:

“So what if abortion ends life?”

Kudos for your candor, Ms. Williams. Except, you should’ve added: “It’s my life that I’m worried about!”

In a blatantly revealing article, Williams writes:

“While opponents of abortion eagerly describe themselves as ‘pro-life,’ the rest of us have had to scramble around with not nearly as big-ticket words like ‘choice’ and ‘reproductive freedom.’

The ‘life’ conversation is often too thorny to even broach. Yet I know that throughout my own pregnancies, I never wavered for a moment in the belief that I was carrying a human life inside of me. I believe that’s what a fetus is: a human life. And that doesn’t make me one iota less solidly pro-choice.”

Chilling confession – made even more chilling by the in-your-face tenor of her comments: “Yeah, of course I believe a fetus is a human life. So what? If you think that makes me any less willing to kill it, you’re crazy.”

So, how does Williams reconcile her belief that a fetus is indeed a human life with having no conscience about ending that life? How did Hitler justify it? How did George Orwell justify it? Simple. All life is not equal:

“Here’s the complicated reality in which we live: All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers.

Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides. She’s the boss. Her life and what is right for her circumstances and her health should automatically trump the rights of the non-autonomous entity inside of her. Always.”

So, let me get this straight, Mary Elizabeth: You’re saying that based on one’s residence, he or she might not have the same rights as his or her host, correct? Kinda like the slaves in the Old South or the Jews in WWII Germany, right? Got it.

Oh, and how clever of you to cradle “what is right for her circumstances” in between (a woman’s) “life” and “health.” You people couch your words very carefully.

While most pro-life advocates accept abortion as an alternative when the life (or health) of the mother is at risk, it’s that whole “right for her circumstances” part where most of us part company with the self-serving, pro-abortion crowd.

What kinds of “circumstances,” Mary Elizabeth? Single mothers? Financial concerns? Fear of commitment? Just not “in the mood” to have a baby? Yeah, “circumstances” – life’s a bitch, huh?

Finally, mustering all of the liberal arrogance she could muster, Williams says:

“If by some random fluke I learned today I was pregnant, you bet your ass I’d have an abortion. I’d have the World’s Greatest Abortion.”

In your case, Mary Elizabeth, I’d say: Go for it. As to your silly “World’s Greatest Abortion” line? Call me an “intimidating wingnut” – one of those to whom you refer in your pathetic article -  but I’d have to say the “World’s Greatest Abortion” would’ve been the one your mom missed out on prior to your birth.

Sorry – nothing personal – it’s just that “all life is not equal.”

About these ads


Categories: Abortion, Pro-"Choice", Pro-Life

Tags: , , ,

20 replies

  1. Sure hope Mary Elizabeth reads this…Rat just put her in her place. Nice job you wonderful intimidating wingnut, especially that last comment.

  2. Heeeeeere’s Rat. Informative, humorous, on point, and “Right.” Not the Tonight Show. The Right Here & Now Show!

    Just on point and “Right” for this article. No room for humor, I understand.

    Is it odd that the Salon story you discuss came out on same day Hillary appeared before Congress, with “What difference does it make” statement? Same playbook?

    Maybe instead of “World’s Greatest Abortion”, maybe Mother of All Abortions…abortee survives, abortor succumbs. Not to be judgmental over all cases, but seems to fit her or “what is right for her circumstances.”

  3. And liberals are proud of themselves for their “right to choose.” Shame.

    Reporters Who Watch Abortions Tell of Their Brutal Reality

  4. Sadly, many people do not understand the simple concept of the life cycle. It does not matter if you are one second old, or one hundred years old; you are a human. Thing is, unborn children are unable to defend themselves against abortion. People always talk about a woman’s right to do want she wants with her bod, but never talk about the baby’s rights.

  5. Exposing the lunacy of liberalism one post at a time!

Trackbacks

  1. There’s this thing; it’s called Tolerance… | The Cranky Giraffe

What's Your Take?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,313 other followers

%d bloggers like this: