‘ALL LIFE IS NOT EQUAL’
There’s nothing quite as exhilarating as seeing a liberal come out and just say what he or she truly believes. It happened last week – twice. First, Rolling Stones reporter Michael Hastings fessed up that, yes, he and his fellow swooners do in fact “lose their minds” whenever they’re in the presence of The One. (Chris Matthews’s leg seen tingling in approval.)
Not to be outdone, Salon’s unabashedly pro-abortion champion, Mary Elizabeth Williams dropped the silly pretense that “an aborted fetus isn’t a baby” – and said the words most pro-”choice” advocates believe – but don’t have the guts to say out loud:
“So what if abortion ends life?”
Kudos for your candor, Ms. Williams. Except, you should’ve added: “It’s my life that I’m worried about!”
In a blatantly revealing article, Williams writes:
“While opponents of abortion eagerly describe themselves as ‘pro-life,’ the rest of us have had to scramble around with not nearly as big-ticket words like ‘choice’ and ‘reproductive freedom.’
The ‘life’ conversation is often too thorny to even broach. Yet I know that throughout my own pregnancies, I never wavered for a moment in the belief that I was carrying a human life inside of me. I believe that’s what a fetus is: a human life. And that doesn’t make me one iota less solidly pro-choice.”
Chilling confession – made even more chilling by the in-your-face tenor of her comments: “Yeah, of course I believe a fetus is a human life. So what? If you think that makes me any less willing to kill it, you’re crazy.”
So, how does Williams reconcile her belief that a fetus is indeed a human life with having no conscience about ending that life? How did Hitler justify it? How did George Orwell justify it? Simple. All life is not equal:
“Here’s the complicated reality in which we live: All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers.
Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides. She’s the boss. Her life and what is right for her circumstances and her health should automatically trump the rights of the non-autonomous entity inside of her. Always.”
So, let me get this straight, Mary Elizabeth: You’re saying that based on one’s residence, he or she might not have the same rights as his or her host, correct? Kinda like the slaves in the Old South or the Jews in WWII Germany, right? Got it.
Oh, and how clever of you to cradle “what is right for her circumstances” in between (a woman’s) “life” and “health.” You people couch your words very carefully.
While most pro-life advocates accept abortion as an alternative when the life (or health) of the mother is at risk, it’s that whole “right for her circumstances” part where most of us part company with the self-serving, pro-abortion crowd.
What kinds of “circumstances,” Mary Elizabeth? Single mothers? Financial concerns? Fear of commitment? Just not “in the mood” to have a baby? Yeah, “circumstances” – life’s a bitch, huh?
Finally, mustering all of the liberal arrogance she could muster, Williams says:
“If by some random fluke I learned today I was pregnant, you bet your ass I’d have an abortion. I’d have the World’s Greatest Abortion.”
In your case, Mary Elizabeth, I’d say: Go for it. As to your silly “World’s Greatest Abortion” line? Call me an “intimidating wingnut” – one of those to whom you refer in your pathetic article - but I’d have to say the “World’s Greatest Abortion” would’ve been the one your mom missed out on prior to your birth.
Sorry – nothing personal – it’s just that “all life is not equal.”
Categories: Abortion, Pro-"Choice", Pro-Life
Tags: Abortion, Abortion debate, Pro-Abortion, Pro-Choice
Related Articles
-
Democrat Congressman: Banning Post-Five-Month Abortion Is ‘Morally Outrageous’
-
Evil Hag Pelosi: Late Term Abortions Are ‘Sacred’
-
Obama To Planned Parenthood: ‘God Bless You’
-
Obama Caves To Criticism – Backs Out Of Planned Parenthood Keynote Address
-
Planned Parenthood Lobbyist: Of Course We Support Post-Birth ‘Abortion’ – Doesn’t Everyone?
-
Oregon Teacher Escorted Out By Police; Set To Be Fired For Opposing Planned Parenthood In The Classroom
Sure hope Mary Elizabeth reads this…Rat just put her in her place. Nice job you wonderful intimidating wingnut, especially that last comment.
Thank you, Deborah. The obscene arrogance of people like Mary Elizabeth is disgusting – particularly when it relates to this issue.
You are welcome Rat. I have been away from computer for a month…saved all your blogs. Reading now, you have been a busy man.
Someone’s gotta do it.
Heeeeeere’s Rat. Informative, humorous, on point, and “Right.” Not the Tonight Show. The Right Here & Now Show!
Just on point and “Right” for this article. No room for humor, I understand.
Is it odd that the Salon story you discuss came out on same day Hillary appeared before Congress, with “What difference does it make” statement? Same playbook?
Maybe instead of “World’s Greatest Abortion”, maybe Mother of All Abortions…abortee survives, abortor succumbs. Not to be judgmental over all cases, but seems to fit her or “what is right for her circumstances.”
And liberals are proud of themselves for their “right to choose.” Shame.
Reporters Who Watch Abortions Tell of Their Brutal Reality
We be the living will and testement as to whether they continue to carry it out. OId Reagan pegged it just right a long time ago…”I’ve noticed that everyone who is for abortion has already been born.”
I don’t believe that’s all there is…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qe9kKf7SHco
I stand with you…until they get that IPAB after me. And til it really gets me.
Read something to this effect recently: Liberals don’t kill children with guns; they prefer to use abortions.
Your picture is dramatic. However it would end recurrence. That may be the education we are all headed for as to birth control and population control.
In spite of the seriousness of this discussion, look at how one site views having a baby…
http://digitaljournal.com/article/338640
Clever. Wonder if libs can switch the machine to “vacuum” mode?
Only suck air enough to blow their nose or spread more or their squat, if you know what I mean.
Was thinking more along the lines of removing the baby – er, sorry – “mass of cells.”
or or of. What…am I becoming a defining what is is guy? No, I don’t need no definition from Slick. What he and his clan is is. Don’t step in it.
Posted before the “mass of cells” post. Baby is same as cancer to the loons.
Worse, to some.
Sadly, many people do not understand the simple concept of the life cycle. It does not matter if you are one second old, or one hundred years old; you are a human. Thing is, unborn children are unable to defend themselves against abortion. People always talk about a woman’s right to do want she wants with her bod, but never talk about the baby’s rights.
Which is exactly why the “woman’s right to choose” label is a disgusting disgrace.
Exposing the lunacy of liberalism one post at a time!
Absolutely!